Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Bereishit

The first chapter of the Torah is a description of the creative process that brought our world into existence. The whole of the Torah was written in a language that an average person would have understood. "The Torah spoke in human language", says the Talmud in Brachot 31b. We should not be surprised if our modern mind finds difficulties in understanding words that seem modern but might have meant something different once. A "day" can have several meanings. What was a day before the cycle around the sun was established on the fourth day? And would they have understood the notion of the earth revolving around the sun thousands of years before Galileo?

But there is another important paradox in the opening chapters. In the first chapter God creates the plants and the trees, but in the second it says that there was nothing on earth because it hadn't yet rained and man was not there to till the ground. In the first chapter man and woman are created together, while in the second man is made first, is presented with animals as potential partners, and only then is Eve fashioned from the rib.

There are six creative days of chapter one, but only one in, "This is the story of the heavens and the earth on the day they were created." I understand the first chapter to be talking about the ingredients of creation and the second to be talking about relationships--humanity to nature and the animal world, relations between man and woman.

You often find an idea or a narrative in the Torah is too complex to be described fully in one version or that it requires two different viewpoints to fully describe the process. You have two versions of the Tabernacle; the first contains the basic elements, the second talks about how they function. There are two versions of the Ten Commandments, two different justifications for keeping Shabbat, the Song of the Sea is repeated in condensed form, the narrative of the Golden Calf is given twice, and Eliezer's journey to find a wife for Isaac is reported and repeated. Here the first chapter of Creation describes the contents of the world. The second describes the interactions and relationships.

Sometimes the many facets of an idea are conveyed sequentially, each new description adding an extra and important dimension. It is not that there is a contradiction, simply an expansion.

Thursday, September 2, 2010

Nitzavim & Vayelech

God tells Moses that he must hand over the leadership of Children of Israel to Joshua. He then goes on to say that after Moses’ death "this people will be seduced after the strange gods of the land that it is entering, and it will desert Me and renege on the agreement I made with it ... and I will hide My face on that day"(Deuteronomy 31:18).

This simple phrase disguises a major theological issue. The Torah is not a theological document in the way that Greek philosophy would have understood theology, or indeed in the way Christian theology developed. It is not a system based on pure logic or rational reasoning. Logically, a nonphysical, supernatural force cannot have a body or moods like humans. I know there is a heated debate about whether some great Jews of the past did actually think God had a body, but we now all accept, as we sing in Adon Olam, “He has no material form and has no body.” So on that level, we do not take the Torah literally.

However, within Torah there are a series of statements about God’s relationship to humanity that have come to influence Jewish thinking. This idea of "Hester Panim", hiding of God’s "face", is one of these. Superficially, it implies that God engages with humanity on a reciprocal level. Our increase in spiritual activity acts as a sort of magnet that attracts Divine Intervention. Mystically, God interacts all the time with humanity. The problem we have is that we often do not see it or realize it. To hide a face is not to remove it, but to disguise it. So God is there all the time. It is just that we do not know how to experience God. While we live Jewish lives we have a chance to break down the barriers, through religious experience. But if we do not live a religious life, even if only superficially, then we will be less likely to establish any kind of contact. Pagan or secular life is so focused on physical targets and goals that it has no room for the spiritual.

The Kabbalists argued that God, in the absolute sense, is not subject to change. But for humans to interact with God, God has to find a way of "diluting" or "filtering" into a form that humans can relate to. This is the system of the Sephirot, the ten "Attributes" or "Emanations" that enable the absolutely infinite Ein Sof to "transform" to Shechina, the Divine Presence that we experience.

But whichever way we try to look at it, as Maimonides says, we simply cannot describe God in human terms. So "God hiding His face" should not be taken as theology. Rather it is an analogy, just as the "Hand of God" implies no dirty fingernails or the "Anger of God" implies no rise in blood pressure.

To hide one’s face can also be understood as an act of despair, of God’s "pain" at not wanting to see what stupid things we humans are capable of doing.